Pages

Friday, June 24, 2016

News from the AAN Annual Meeting: What is the Role of Vascular Etiologies in Parkinsonism? Experts Offer Two Different Views

June 23, 2016
Collins, Thomas S.


ARTICLE IN BRIEF
Two movement disorders specialists debate whether vascular risk factors contribute to parkinsonism. One cites data showing comorbid vascular diseases, while the other counters that it is difficult to make the association because the definition of vascular parkinsonism is ill-defined.
VANCOUVER—Whether vascular causes play a major role in parkinsonism is a gray area, said two Parkinson's disease experts here in a plenary discussion of controversies in neurology at the AAN Annual Meeting in April. And they said how to answer that question is a matter of debate.
The lack of a universal rule on how to define parkinsonism contributes to the controversy, both experts agreed.
Aron S. Buchman, MD, professor of neurological sciences at the Rush University Alzheimer's Disease Center, said a review of cases at his center seems to show that vascular diseases, risk factors, and pathologies in the brain and spinal cord are strongly related to parkinsonism, while Alberto J. Espay, MD, FAAN, clinical research director of the James J. and Joan A. Gardner Center for Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders at the University of Cincinnati, countered that it's difficult to make that claim.

THE CASE FOR VASCULAR ETIOLOGY
 DR. ARON S.  Buchman  
Dr. Buchman cited data from the Religious Order Study, in which more than 1,300 nuns and priests across the US have been followed up at a 95 percent rate and with a 90 percent autopsy rate, adding up to more than 600 autopsies, and the Chicago-area Memory & Aging Project, with 1,800 people followed up at a rate of 90 percent, with 650 autopsies available.
At Rush, researchers categorized people as demonstrating parkinsonism using the 26 items in the motor section of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, which is divided into four domains — parkinsonian gait, rigidity, bradykinesia, and tremor — with several tasks within each domain. If a person met two or more criteria within a domain, that domain was considered to be present. The presence of two more domains meant that a person was considered to have parkinsonism.
Using data from these studies, they looked at whether vascular diseases and vascular risk factors were related to parkinsonism. They reported in a 2011 paper in Stroke that demographics, such as age and education, together with vascular diseases like myocardial infarction and stroke as well as risk factors such as body-mass index and diabetes, accounted for approximately 30 percent of the parkinsonism variance they saw in the cohort. But they also found other vascular factors, such as claudication and hypertension, were not significant predictors.
What's more, Dr. Buchman said, researchers have also found that cerebrovascular pathology is associated with the severity of parkinsonism, with macroinfarcts, microinfarcts, and arteriolosclerosis predicting the severity of parkinsonism even when controlling for demographics and Parkinson's disease pathology of the substantia nigra.
“This finding of the microinfarcts and arteriolosclerosis is very important,” he said. “About one-third of the cohort had these. These abnormalities would not be seen with ante-mortem magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]. You could only see them postmortem. And so it suggests that it's an unrecognized cause of parkinsonism that you wouldn't be able to see even if you did an MRI.”
Researchers also closely examined the microvascular pathology in the brains and spinal cords of 150 people, and found that arteriolosclerosis of the spinal cord was present to a greater degree than arteriosclerosis in the brain, and it was the only factor that explained any of the variance of parkinsonism.
“All the other brain pathologies” — which included atherosclerosis, Lewy Body, nigral neuronal loss, and Alzheimer's disease pathology — “fall out and don't explain any of the variance of parkinsonism,” Dr. Buchman said.
This, he said, “suggests that there's a tremendous gap in our ability to understand what the basis of parkinsonism is. It suggests that we need to look at the entire pathway that probably includes the nerve and muscle and the musculoskeletal element to really explicate what we're talking about.”

THE CASE AGAINST VASCULAR INVOLVEMENT
Dr Alberto Espay

Dr. Espay countered that it's difficult to make the claim that vascular etiology is a common cause of parkinsonism because “vascular parkinsonism” (VaP) is so ill-defined. It's a diagnosis, he said, without specific clinical, imaging, or pathologic features.
One systematic review, published in 2010 in the journal Movement Disorders, covered 25 articles on differentiating vascular parkinsonism from idiopathic Parkinson's disease and found no abnormal imaging pattern that was specific to vascular parkinsonism.
There also seems to be no clinical-pathological correlation, Dr. Espay said. In one of only two post-mortem studies, with vascular parkinsonism defined as the presence of parkinsonism and pathological evidence of cerebrovascular lesions but no depigmentation or Lewy bodies at the substantia nigra, researchers found no difference in the extent of vascular lesions in the basal ganglia between those with VaP and those with Binswanger's disease, or subcortical vascular dementia.
The term “vascular parkinsonism” itself is defined very loosely, he said. A study that helped generate the current criteria for the syndrome showed that the severity of microscopic small-vessel disease did not differ between the frontal, temporal, parietal, occipital, and striatal regions. There was also no clinical specificity in its VaP definition — with VaP criteria met, for instance, with either acute, delayed, or insidious presentations, either uni- or bi-lateral parkinsonism, with or without gait impairment, or with focal or diffuse lesions.
He added that data on prevalence also don't seem to support a causal connection between vascular etiology and parkinsonism.
“If you truly think that there is a condition called ‘vascular parkinsonism,’” he said, “we could assume that cerebrovascular disease and parkinsonism are going to increase in prevalence in parallel. But the data that have accumulated so far show that there really isn't a correlation between cerebrovascular disease and parkinsonism.”
Both Drs. Buchman and Espay agreed, however, that if the term is going to be used, it's in the best interests of the field to begin describing vascular parkinsonism using objective measures. Dr. Buchman described how his center is beginning to use body sensors to describe gait in a more thorough, objective fashion.
“I think that moving in the direction of having objective measures and dispensing with qualitative labels would be very helpful for moving forward to understand the biology,” he said.
Dr. Espay agreed. “I suspect that many of the concepts related to parkinsonism and vascular phenotype are really driven by a poor characterization of the gait and the overall features,” he said. “And in this I agree that we need to have more sophisticated measurements and certainly cannot rely purely on imaging.”
Howard I. Hurtig, MD, emeritus professor of neurology specializing in Parkinson's disease at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, who attended the debate, called Dr. Buchman's view a “plausible hypothesis.”
“I definitely accept that that's a possibility,” he said. “I don't think he goes overboard and says that strokes in old people definitely cause Parkinson's or parkinsonism signs. He says they may contribute, which is reasonable.”
Clinically, insofar as this view leads to more awareness of vascular health, it is helpful, he said. “Forever we've struggled with the fact that hypertension is under-treated in society, and if people were more aware of the risks of stroke-related hypertension, then individuals would be more vigilant about watching their blood pressure and having it treated. So I think to the extent that this has a practical application, it's a good point. If you can prevent cerebrovascular disease by simply treating high blood pressure, which is one of the most important causes of stroke and microinfarcts, then at least you've achieved something in the realm of public policy.”
“It's good to assume that vascular factors can contribute,” Dr. Hurtig continued. “The big problem of course is that it's [often] too late for treatment when someone starts to develop these signs.”

http://journals.lww.com/neurotodayonline/Fulltext/2016/06230/News_from_the_AAN_Annual_Meeting__What_is_the_Role.10.aspx

No comments:

Post a Comment