Date:
September 29, 2014
Source:
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical
Center
Summary:
Brain networks -- the
interconnected pathways that link brain circuits to one another -- can help
guide site selection for brain stimulation therapies, a new study suggests.
Over the past several decades, brain stimulation has become an increasingly
important treatment option for a number of psychiatric and neurological
conditions.
Over the past several
decades, brain stimulation has become an increasingly important treatment
option for a number of psychiatric and neurological conditions.
Divided into two broad
approaches, invasive and noninvasive, brain stimulation works by targeting
specific sites to adjust brain activity. The most widely known invasive
technique, deep brain stimulation (DBS), requires brain surgery to insert an
electrode and is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for
the treatment of Parkinson’s disease and essential tremor. Noninvasive
techniques, including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), can be
administered from outside the head and are currently approved for the treatment
of depression. Brain stimulation can result in dramatic benefit to patients
with these disorders, motivating researchers to test whether it can also help
patients with other diseases.
But, in many cases, the ideal
sites to administer stimulation have remained ambiguous. Exactly where in the
brain is the best spot to stimulate to treat a given patient or a given
disease?
Now a new study in the Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) helps answer this question. Led
by investigators at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), the findings
suggest that brain networks – the interconnected pathways that link brain
circuits to one another-- can help guide site selection for brain stimulation
therapies.
“Although different types of
brain stimulation are currently applied in different locations, we found that
the targets used to treat the same disease are nodes in the same connected
brain network,” says first author Michael D. Fox, MD, PhD, an investigator in
the Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation and in the
Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders Center at BIDMC.
“This may have implications
for how we administer brain stimulation to treat disease. If you want to treat
Parkinson’s disease or tremor with brain stimulation, you can insert an
electrode deep in the brain and get a great effect. However, getting this same
benefit with noninvasive stimulation is difficult, as you can’t directly
stimulate the same site deep in the brain from outside the head,” explains Fox,
an Assistant Professor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School (HMS). “But, by
looking at the brain’s own network connectivity, we can identify sites on the
surface of the brain that connect with this deep site, and stimulate those
sites noninvasively.”
Brain networks consist of
interconnected pathways linking brain circuits or loops, similar to a college
campus in which paved sidewalks connect a wide variety of buildings.
In this paper, Fox led a team
that first conducted a large-scale literature search to identify all
neurological and psychiatric diseases where improvement had been seen with both
invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation. Their analysis revealed 14
conditions: addiction, Alzheimer’s disease, anorexia, depression, dystonia,
epilepsy, essential tremor, gait dysfunction, Huntington’s disease, minimally
conscious state, obsessive compulsive disorder, pain, Parkinson disease and
Tourette syndrome. They next listed the stimulation sites, either deep in the brain
or on the surface of the brain, thought to be effective for the treatment of
each of the 14 diseases.
“We wanted to test the
hypothesis that these various stimulation sites are actually different spots
within the same brain network,” explains Fox. “To examine the connectivity from
any one site to other brain regions, we used a data base of functional MRI
images and a technique that enables you to see correlations in spontaneous
brain activity.” From these correlations, the investigators were able to create
a map of connections from deep brain stimulation sites to the surface of the
brain. When they compared this map to sites on the brain surface that work for
noninvasive brain stimulation, the two matched.
“These results suggest that
brain networks might be used to help us better understand why brain stimulation
works and to improve therapy by identifying the best place to stimulate the
brain for each individual patient and given disease,” says senior author Alvaro
Pascual-Leone, MD, PhD, the Director of the Berenson-Allen Center for
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation at BIDMC and Professor of Neurology at HMS. “This
study illustrates the potential of gaining fundamental insights into brain
function while helping patients with debilitating diseases, and provides us
with a powerful way of selecting targets based on their connectivity to other
regions that can be widely applied to help guide brain stimulation therapy
across multiple neurological and psychiatric disorders.”
“As we’re trying different
types of brain stimulation for different diseases, the question comes up, ‘How
does one relate to the other?’” notes Fox. “In other words, can we use the
success in one to help design a trial or inform how we apply a new type of
brain stimulation? Our new findings suggest that resting-state functional
connectivity may be useful for translating therapy between treatment
modalities, optimizing treatment and identifying new stimulation targets.”
end text
Story Source:
end story_source
Journal Reference:
M. D. Fox, R. L. Buckner, H.
Liu, M. M. Chakravarty, A. M. Lozano, A. Pascual-Leone. Resting-state networks
link invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation across diverse psychiatric and
neurological diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
2014; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1405003111
end journal_references
Cite This Page:
MLA
APA
Chicago
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical
Center. "New clues revealed to understand brain stimulation."
ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 29 September 2014.
<www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140929153935.htm>.
No comments:
Post a Comment