Abstract
Objective: To describe the clinical
features, treatment(s), and outcomes of 15 HIV-infected patients with
idiopathic Parkinson disease (PD) and sustained virus suppression and
immunologic reconstitution, from a reference cohort of 9847 persons living with
HIV (PLH).
Methods: This retrospective,
single-center matched case–control 1:2 study included PLH-PD patients evaluated
over a 12-year period (2002–2013) with mean follow-up of 6.5 years. PD clinical
features and dopamine replacement therapy (DRT) were compared, and biologically
relevant HIV data were assessed.
Results: PD prevalence in PLH was
similar to that of the general population. At onset, clinical presentations and
therapeutic management were similar for both groups. Rapidly effective DRT was
well tolerated without combined antiretroviral therapy interactions or virus
escape. At the end of the follow-up, compared with HIV-negative PD, PLH had a
significantly lower median Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score
(4 vs 14; P < 0.001), median Hoehn and Yahr stage (1 vs 2; P =
0.0005), and median Handipark scale score (2 vs 3; P = 0.0036) under the
same daily DRT. One PLH underwent highly successful deep brain stimulation of
the subthalamic nucleus.
Conclusions: HIV-associated PD is similar
to idiopathic PD with some features suggesting an HIV-induced functional
adaptation of dopaminergic neurons that might counterbalance the PD-induced
neuronal loss. Concurrent HIV infection does not compromise the outcome of
idiopathic PD.
Introduction
In countries where combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) is
widely available, the HIV epidemic is entering a chronic phase in which the
majority of persons living with HIV (PLH) have a life expectancy approaching
general population norms.[1]
As a consequence, more PLH are aged 50 years or older, estimated to represent,
by 2015, the majority of all PLH in Western countries. Prone to developing
age-related diseases, male PLH, compared with HIV-negative men, have a higher
burden of neurologic diseases that may also develop at younger ages.[2]
The central nervous system (CNS) is highly vulnerable to HIV
infection, particularly the dopamine (DA)-rich brain regions. Basal ganglia
play a pivotal role because they are a virus-replication hot spot, and the
substantia nigra suffered up to 25% neuronal loss in AIDS.[3]
Parkinsonism in patients with AIDS was frequent before the cART era. Although
ART successfully reduces the plasma HIV viral load (plVL), it is not effective
at attenuating HIV-induced neuroinflammation that can lead to deregulation of
the dopaminergic system.[4]
Since the identification of increased alpha-synuclein deposition
in the substantia nigra of aging PLH,[5]
the hypothesis that expression and progression of neurodegenerative diseases,
for example, Parkinson disease (PD), might be facilitated by HIV was advanced.[4]
Pathogenetic mechanisms of PD and HIV-associated neurologic complications
partially overlap and include chronic neuroinflammation, oxidative stress,
lymphocytic infiltration, and impaired mitochondrial function.[3,6]
Hence, some authors considered a predisposition, even a pathogenetic link,
between HIV and long-term cART, with PD development.[4,7]
However, that notion originated from a few isolated cases or small series (Table 1).[7–12]
We undertook this retrospective, single-center case–control
study to determine whether idiopathic PD characteristics are indeed different
in PLH. We distinguished PD, the idiopathic form of the disease, from
Parkinsonism, the broader descriptive term referring to heterogeneous
diagnoses. Moreover, the Parkinsonism seen in patients with AIDS is often
atypical in presentation, with symmetrical signs of bradykinesia and rigidity,
frequent lack of rest tremor, and early presentation of postural instability
and gait difficulty.[13,14]
Because of different samples and Parkinsonism case definitions in HIV
infection, we chose to limit our study to idiopathic PD according to the United
Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Society (UKPDS) Brain Bank criteria[15]
with asymmetry at onset and response to L-dopa.
This
study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Fondation
Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild. Informed consent was waived because of
anonymous data collection.
Study
Population
Data Analysis
Statistical Analyses
Between 2002 and 2013, we
identified 15 PLH-PD patients followed in 3 university hospital infectious
diseases units caring for 9847 PLH in the Paris area. This reference cohort is
composed of 71% men [mean age of 47 (25% >50) years; 92% taking cART for a median
of 10 years; plVL undetectable in >85%; and median CD4 cell count 550/μL].
Inclusion criteria for PLH-PD were (1) PD diagnosed according to the UKPDS
Brain Bank criteria[15] by 2
neurologists, one of whom is a movement-disorder specialist (J.-P.B. or M.Z.);
(2) DaTSCAN showing typical asymmetric hypofixation in the striatum and putamen
at PD onset; (3) normal 1.5 Tesla brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and
spectroscopy at PD onset; (4) absence of cognitive impairment at onset with a
total Montreal cognitive assessment score >26/30; and (5) follow-up
available for >2 years. Exclusion criteria were (1) head injury with loss of
consciousness >5 minutes; (2) cerebral opportunistic infection or lymphoma;
(3) neurologic disease other than PD; (4) psychiatric disorders other than
depression or anxiety; and (5) neuroleptic treatment or amphetamine use. Two
male HIV-negative controls, randomly selected from the James Parkinson Unit
database at Fondation Rothschild, were matched to each case for age and PD duration,
because they are among the strongest contributors to PD progression in the
general population.[16]Inclusion
criteria for controls were (1) PD diagnosed according to the UKPDS Brain Bank
criteria; (2) absence of cognitive impairment at PD onset with a total short
portable mental status questionnaire <2; and (3) absence of HIV infection.
Their exclusion criteria were the same as for PLH-PD. Case and control
diagnoses were monitored during follow-up to ensure high diagnostic accuracy
and exclude those with atypical Parkinsonism.
Clinical PD characteristics were
first symptoms at onset, the modified Hoehn and Yahr (H-Y) stage,[17]Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale
(UPDRS) motor score,[17] fluctuations,
falls, freezing, dyskinesia, and Montreal cognitive assessment–assessed mental
status for PLH-PD,[18] and
the short portable mental status questionnaire for controls.[19] To evaluate activities of daily
living and handicap severity, we routinely use the Handipark scale,
specifically developed for PD and validated, correlated with the Schwab and
England, UPDRS, and H-Y scales with an independent score from the moment the
patient is examined.[20] Clinical
PD severity was assessed in an operationally defined "on state" based
on expert judgment at the time of the consultation, which is regularly used in
many studies.[21–24] Thus,
patients and controls were not necessarily at the peak of optimal response
(true "on state"). Because the same definition was used for both
groups, our results are valid and comparable. Also, DA replacement therapy
(DRT) information was collected as follows: daily levodopa-equivalent dose
(LED) based on standard methods for calculation,[25] repeated-dose
regimen, and duration of levodopa use. Impulse control disorders (ICDs) were systematically
sought during each consultation.
Data are expressed as medians (range), unless
stated otherwise. The differences between the distributions of categorical data
were compared using Fisher exact test, with P < 0.05
defining significance, whereas continuous variables were compared with the
Wilcoxon rank-sum test. JMP.10 software (2012 SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was
used.
Results
The clinical and laboratory findings for PLH-PD patients are
presented in Table 2.
All were taking cART, and 11 of 15 had CD4 cell counts >500/μL at PD onset.
All had sustained virus suppression and immune reconstitution during follow-up
exceeding 5 years. The median time since HIV diagnosis was 22.7 (3.4–29.4)
years. PLH-PD patient 8 and 4 controls had family histories of PD.
The PD characteristics of cases and controls are detailed in Table 3.
At PD onset, their neurological examinations, median UPDRS motor scores, and
therapeutic management with the same diagnosis-to-starting first-line therapy
(a DA agonist for most) or levodopa interval were comparable. At the end of the
follow-up, the median daily LED and repeated-dose regimen per day, cognition,
and rates of fluctuations, drug-induced dyskinesias, freezing or falls were
also similar.
In contrast some PLH-PD patients' features differed from
controls. At the last consultation, with the same daily LED and regimen for
both groups, PLH had significantly lower median UPDRS motor score, the lower
median modified H-Y stage, and lower median Handipark scale score (Table 3).
More PLH reported hallucinations consisting essentially of feeling of presence
(70%). ICDs were also more frequent in PLH, involving excessive buying and
generosity (n = 8), internet addiction (n = 3), pathologic internet gambling
poker (n = 1), or hypersexuality (n = 2).
Four PLH-PD patients exhibited a very unusual feature consisting
of a stereotyped subacute severe motor degradation over a few weeks that was
totally reversed by levodopa dose intensification. The patients' responses to
usual medications became less consistent, with longer OFF periods. PLH
complained of unrestricted ambulation declining to <500 m, freezing, wearing
off, falls, and camptocormia with abdominal pain. These patients experienced
frank worsening of their bradykinesia and axial rigidity that principally
resulted in abnormal posture, with an UPDRS motor score increment within a few
weeks of ≥20 points, reaching a maximum total score of 60/108 points for
patient 6, whereas his score before worsening had been 12/108 points. In
parallel, the H-Y stage progressed from 1 or 1.5 to 3 or 4, without any
associated confusional state. No precipitating factors, that is, reduction or
discontinuation of dopaminergic medication, introduction of drugs known to
worsen Parkinsonism (neuroleptics, antidepressants, and antiemetics),
infections, gastrointestinal tract diseases, or bone fractures were found,
despite extensive workups. All patients rapidly recovered from their
previous-worsening neurological status after increasing the daily levodopa
dose, ranging from 100 to 300 mg/d. DA agonists were ineffective. Within a mean
of 4 months, the UPDRS motor scores and H-Y stage were totally restored, and
patients regained their previous level of function that lasted for >2 years,
without any other therapeutic adjustment.
After 12 years of good symptomatic control, PLH-PD patient 15
underwent deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (DBS-STN) because
of severe fluctuations with peak-dose dyskinesias and >6 hours-a-day OFF
periods, despite a total daily LED of 1500 mg. Before DBS-STN, his ON state
UPDRS motor score was 12/108 and worsened to 54/108 in the OFF state. No
short-term or long-term adverse event was recorded after the same DBS-STN
procedure as that for the general population: his UPDRS motor score fell to
6/108 and, at his last consultation, 2.5 years later, daily LED was 575 mg/d,
UPDRS motor was 12/108 with no fluctuations.
Discussion
Evidence
from clinical, imaging, biochemical, murine models, and pathological studies
underscored a major contribution of bilateral basal ganglia dysfunction in
HIV-associated neurologic complications, particularly the pathogenesis of HIV
dementia, a subcortical dementia with the core symptoms resembling PD.[3]
Positron emission tomography studies demonstrated a bilateral decreased of
dopaminergic transporters within the caudate and putamen in HIV-infected
patients with dementia compared with seronegative controls.[26]
However, the dopaminergic transporter–reduction patterns in PLH were not
typical of those seen in PD but showed parallel findings of greater reduction
in the putamen than the caudate.[26]
Before
the widespread use of cART, Parkinsonism was relatively frequent in AIDS, being
predominantly iatrogenic, or associated with opportunistic infections or HIV
infection itself. During the pre-cART era (1986–1999), Parkinsonism affected up
to 5%–10% of all PLH.[3,14]
In the post-cART era with better control of HIV infection, that frequency fell
to 0.2%, whereas the mean age of these patients rose from 37.2 to 62.5 years.[8]
Differences between health care systems are important concerns when evaluating
the true prevalence of cART era CNS complications. Indeed, 49% of all PLH in
the United States do not remain under care and only 19% are estimated to
achieve circulating HIV suppression.[27]
In contrast, in France, and other countries where cART is provided free, 87% of
PLH are currently under care with only 9.7% of patients experiencing
virological failure.[28]
In the cART era, parkinsonian symptoms were noted in up to 80% of PLH over 50
years of age from the Hawaii Aging with HIV Cohort, leading to the conclusion
of increased extrapyramidal motor signs with aging.[29]
Among PLH older than 50 years and those younger than 40 years, respectively,
47% and 55% had detectable plVL and 20.7% and 11.1% had HIV-associated
dementia. Because their HIV-control indices were not optimum, those patients
seemed to more closely resemble those before the cART era. That study also
found an excessively high percentage of healthy controls having parkinsonian
symptoms also, that is, 52.9% of matched HIV-negative subjects had ≥1
extrapyramidal sign and 15.7% exhibited ≥3 signs on the UPDRS motor test.
Moreover, no brain imaging was available to exclude a causal lesion. Cohorts
that include untreated or not virologically suppressed subjects overestimate
the true prevalence of neurological complications in the cART era and are a
great cause of alarm for patients and physicians, as recently highlighted for
HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders.[30]
Hence, in studies with asymptomatic and aviraemic HIV-seropositive individuals
on cART, the prevalence of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders is similar
to the prevalence expected in HIV-negative populations.[30]
Tisch
and Brew[7]
described 3 PLH-PD patients, aged 44–53 years, from an Australian cohort of
2500 PLH. Their patients had atypical features distinguishing them from
idiopathic PD: 2 of 3 had a poor or null response to levodopa, despite having
reached therapeutic doses (400 mg/d for 1 and 600 mg/d for the other), and 2 of
3 had early bilateral signs after symptoms onset, whereas they usually appear
after a mean of 4 years in idiopathic PD.[31]
The
diagnosis of idiopathic PD is still mainly clinical. All our patients complied
with the UKPDS Brain Bank criteria,[15]
which are the benchmark of iPD diagnosis and routinely used by all studies as
the gold standard to make the diagnosis process as objective and accurate as
possible.[32]
Moreover, these rigorous diagnostic criteria applied during a specialist's
assessment, as in our study, achieved 95% diagnostic accuracy.[32]
As recommended, we regularly reapplied these criteria to all our patients, HIV+
or not, and, notably, at the end of the median 6.5-year follow-up to minimize
clinical misdiagnosis and exclude atypical features. Hence, retrospective
application of the UKPDS Brain Bank criteria improved the diagnostic accuracy
to 90%.[32,33]
Brain magnetic resonance imaging of PLH excluded AIDS-associated Parkinsonism
with opportunistic infection, tumor, or CNS Whipple disease.[14]
DaTSCAN is not mandatory for the diagnosis of idiopathic PD. We added it to the
UKPDS Brain Bank criteria to confirm the presence of a frank asymmetric
hypofixation in the striatum and putamen in all PD-PLH and to assure that a
degenerative process was indeed responsible for the parkinsonian symptoms.[33]
DaTSCAN sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of early iPD patients
were 79% and 97%, respectively.[34]
Finally, the excellent and sustained clinical benefit of DRT during a mean
follow-up of >6 years provided the best confirmation of the diagnosis of
idiopathic PD for our patients. Indeed, for subjects responsive to DRT,
diagnostic accuracy of PD for disease lasting >5 years reached 88%.[35]
Studied subjects were part of a PLH cohort taking effective cART with most
having sustained virus suppression and >500 CD4 lymphocytes per microliter.
In resource-rich health care settings, these are the most relevant subjects to
study the consequences of prolonged HIV infection and cART on cerebral
function.
Forty
percent of our HIV-infected PD patients were 50 years or younger at onset, as
described in case reports.[7,10–12]
If the bulk of the population with the classic iPD form is 40–75 years of age,[36]
exhibiting a bimodal distribution of iPD-onset age with peaks at 40–44 years
and 75–79 years,[37]
this relatively young age of onset might also be linked to the specificity of
the free health care system in France. All PLH have quarterly consultations and
a systematic thorough annual check-up with their infectious diseases
specialists. Moreover, our cohort patients have easy access to neurological
consultations. The results of several studies demonstrated that a range of
prediagnostic features are present several years before iPD diagnosis, with a
mean time between first symptoms noted by patients and diagnosis reaching 10.2
years.[38]
These favorable conditions might have referred patients as soon as their
initial symptoms were present.
During
a 12-year period, we diagnosed only 15 PD among a cohort of 9847 PLH, which is
much less than expected based on the study by Tisch and Brew[7]
who predicted a 4–8 times higher PD incidence in PLH. Indeed, according to
their calculation, we should have diagnosed at least 44–176 PLH with PD during
our study period. In our cohort, the PD incidence and prevalence rates were
12.7 person years and 152 per 100,000, respectively. In Western general
populations, the annual PD incidence rates range from 9 to 22 per 100,000
inhabitants[39]
and prevalence of 100–200 per 100,000 persons.[40]
Our results do not support a higher PD frequency in PLH with good HIV-control
indices.
Overall,
PD clinical characteristics and therapy did not differ between PLH and
controls. With the same treatment guidelines proposed for idiopathic PD, PLH
had rapid and good responses to DRT that was well tolerated in combination with
cART. We did not observe drug intolerance or cART interactions, as rarely
described,[11]
notably with protease inhibitors.[9]
The results of animal studies suggested that levodopa could increase the risk
of HIV replication and affect immune cells resulting in accelerated disease
progression.[41]
HIV-control indices remained stable during follow-up. The long-term therapeutic
responses were also particularly good, and PLH benefited from the same
so-called "honeymoon" period described for idiopathic PD. Our
patients 1 and 8 had unilateral tremors as their presenting symptom, responded
very well to DRT, and were staged H-Y 1 after 10 years of follow-up. The results
of several studies on the general population demonstrated that tremor-dominant
iPD has a slower disease progression rate, with 70% of patients remaining at
H-Y stage 1 or 2 for years.[42]
As early as 1967, when no DRT was available, Hoehn and Yahr[43]
reported in their seminal article that about one third of their iPD patients,
regardless of phenotypes, had remained in stage 1 or 2 for until 10 years. Our
patient 15 and 2 other published cases[10,11]
suggest that DBS-STN, when pertinent, should be proposed with the same
inclusion and exclusion criteria as for the general population.
The
past decade has seen growing recognition of iPD phenotypic heterogeneity in the
patterns of initial symptoms and progression rates. All these differences do
not invalidate the iPD diagnoses, as demonstrated by autopsy studies.[44]
As reported for the general population, our case–control study based on the
same diagnosis criteria for both groups demonstrated some phenotypic
differences between HIV+ and HIV-negative patients. Notably, some
characteristics were specific to PD in PLH, raising the possibility of
HIV-induced DA-transmission changes by comparison with idiopathic PD. With the
same total mean daily LED and dose regimen at the last consultation, PLH-PD
patients performed significantly better than controls, with lower Handipark
scale and UPDRS motor scores, and an H-Y stage. In keeping with the natural
history of treated idiopathic PD, controls had a mean H-Y stage of 2 after 4.3
years on levodopa and 42% of them had reached H-Y stage 2.5 at the last visit.[31]
With the same PD duration, 80% of PLH had an H-Y stage <2. In our experience
(unpublished data), the mean Handipark scale score after 4 years on levodopa
was 4.4, whereas this score was <2 for 60% of our PLH-PD patients. Nonmotor
complications (eg, ICD and feeling of presence) were also more frequent in PLH
than controls, whereas DRT doses and regimens were similar. Notably, DA
agonists were not overprescribed in PD-PLH compared with controls (100% vs 94%,
respectively). In particular, none of these PD-PLH reported recreational or
polydrug use.
Dysfunction
of dopaminergic neurotransmission, with hypersensitivity of the nigrostriatal
pathways in the CNS of PLH, has been demonstrated.[41]
The results of numerous studies support the hypothesis that HIV induces
neuroinflammation in the structure and function of the CNS reward pathways.[45]
A number of transgenic rodent models have been validated for investigating
neurologically related issues, notably HIV-related pathology and immune
dysfunction.[45]
A gp120-transgenic mouse model showed increased sensitivity to the rewarding
effects of methamphetamine.[45]
PLH are also more likely to abuse substances than the general population,
notably men having sex with men.[46]
It could be the consequence of a premorbid risk-taking personality but HIV
could also be involved in sensitizing individuals to the pleasurable effects of
these substances.[45]
A functional adaptation in presynaptic and postsynaptic dopaminergic neurons
leading to up-regulation of DA receptors could be a plausible explanation of
the PD discrepancies associated with HIV infection and cART.[47]
Those authors described abnormal dopaminergic markers with sharply increased
DA-transporter concentrations, decreased DA synthesis, fewer DA D2
autoreceptors at the presynaptic level, and more DA D3 receptors at the
postsynaptic level, whereas DA D1 receptors remained unchanged.[47]
Postmortem studies from individuals with HIV encephalitis suggested increased
dopaminergic tone in the striatum.[47]
These shifts are opposite to what is observed in idiopathic PD, in which
striatum dopaminergic tone and receptor occupancy are low.[6]
This HIV-induced functional adaptation of dopaminergic neurons might
counterbalance the degenerative neuronal loss and explain the discrepancies
observed in PLH-PD patients.
For
treated PD patients, the average annual progression of motor symptoms is modest
but continuous[48]
with worsening resulting from irreversible progression of neuronal loss. Other
than intervening events, particularly infectious and gastrointestinal
illnesses, discontinuation of dopaminergic medications, and administration of
antidopaminergic drugs, severe acute worsening of UPDRS motor scores is highly
improbable in idiopathic PD.[31,33]
We observed such rapid deterioration in 4 of 15 PLH-PD patients in the absence
of precipitating events, leading to considerable rises of their UPDRS motor
scores, accompanied by unresponsiveness to the same drug regimen that had
adequately corrected symptoms so far. These patients did not differ from the
others, with comparable parkinsonian phenotype or longer PD duration. Moreover,
they had the same age at PD onset, responses to DRT, mean daily LED, the UPDRS
motor scores, and H-Y stage, when deterioration occurred and at the last
consultation. They did not develop PD-related or HIV-associated cognitive
impairment. Their HIV infection was immunovirologically controlled without any
viral escape. Hence, their cART has not been modified. Posture was most affected
because of the appearance or worsening of axial hypertonicity. It is generally
accepted that axial tone and posture abnormalities are more common in advanced
PD, are not levodopa-responsive phenomena,[49]
and even worsen under levodopa.[50]
The UPDRS motor score and H-Y stage returned to their previous levels, a mean
of 4 months after the intensification of the total levodopa dose. This
impressive, acute functional deterioration was like a "bolt from the
blue," and was rapidly and long-lastingly levodopa-responsive. To our
knowledge, it is unique to HIV-associated PD and very unusual in idiopathic PD.
The
principal strength of this study is its recruitment of participants from a
large cohort of immunovirologically controlled PLH and the long-term follow-up
of PD since onset, enabling description of the natural history of treated PD in
PLH. Previous reports were hampered by small patient numbers or isolated case
reports, short follow-up, and absence of matched controls. Our study's
limitations include unavailable neurologic examination results for the entire
PLH cohort, but they were available for those referred by their infectious
diseases specialists. However, in France, all PLH have a systematic annual
check-up with thorough physical examination, and access and referral to weekly
neurologic consultation in each of the 3 Infectious Diseases Units
participating in this study is assured by 2 neurologists (A.M. and A.G.). The
risk that a PLH-PD patient could have been missed is highly improbable over the
12-year study period.[35]
Some sex discrepancies were reported, with a higher PD burden in men;[51]
because all our PLH-PD patients are men, we cannot extrapolate our results to
HIV-infected women. Our control and PLH-PD patients may not necessarily be
representative of an underlying population of newly diagnosed PD patients,
because they were derived from clinics specializing in PD and neurologic
disorders linked to HIV infection. The better response to DRT of HIV-infected PD
patients could be biased by the retrospective character of this study. These
limitations are tempered by the fact that the same selection criteria were
applied for both cases and controls.
A
higher incidence of medical comorbidities will probably emerge with the aging
of PLH. Although more new PD cases are likely to be diagnosed in PLH, we
consider this association to be merely a simultaneous occurrence with no
etiopathogenetic link, like the majority of authors who reported PD in
association with HIV.[10]
The same therapeutic regimen should be proposed to PLH-PD patients but some
peculiarities associated with HIV infection suggest better and sustained
responses to DRT. Our results need to be confirmed with prospective and
multicenter studies.
Abstract
Objective: To describe the clinical
features, treatment(s), and outcomes of 15 HIV-infected patients with
idiopathic Parkinson disease (PD) and sustained virus suppression and
immunologic reconstitution, from a reference cohort of 9847 persons living with
HIV (PLH).
Methods: This retrospective,
single-center matched case–control 1:2 study included PLH-PD patients evaluated
over a 12-year period (2002–2013) with mean follow-up of 6.5 years. PD clinical
features and dopamine replacement therapy (DRT) were compared, and biologically
relevant HIV data were assessed.
Results: PD prevalence in PLH was
similar to that of the general population. At onset, clinical presentations and
therapeutic management were similar for both groups. Rapidly effective DRT was
well tolerated without combined antiretroviral therapy interactions or virus
escape. At the end of the follow-up, compared with HIV-negative PD, PLH had a
significantly lower median Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score
(4 vs 14; P < 0.001), median Hoehn and Yahr stage (1 vs 2; P =
0.0005), and median Handipark scale score (2 vs 3; P = 0.0036) under the
same daily DRT. One PLH underwent highly successful deep brain stimulation of
the subthalamic nucleus.
Conclusions: HIV-associated PD is similar
to idiopathic PD with some features suggesting an HIV-induced functional
adaptation of dopaminergic neurons that might counterbalance the PD-induced
neuronal loss. Concurrent HIV infection does not compromise the outcome of
idiopathic PD.
Introduction
In countries where combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) is
widely available, the HIV epidemic is entering a chronic phase in which the
majority of persons living with HIV (PLH) have a life expectancy approaching
general population norms.[1]
As a consequence, more PLH are aged 50 years or older, estimated to represent,
by 2015, the majority of all PLH in Western countries. Prone to developing
age-related diseases, male PLH, compared with HIV-negative men, have a higher
burden of neurologic diseases that may also develop at younger ages.[2]
The central nervous system (CNS) is highly vulnerable to HIV
infection, particularly the dopamine (DA)-rich brain regions. Basal ganglia
play a pivotal role because they are a virus-replication hot spot, and the
substantia nigra suffered up to 25% neuronal loss in AIDS.[3]
Parkinsonism in patients with AIDS was frequent before the cART era. Although
ART successfully reduces the plasma HIV viral load (plVL), it is not effective
at attenuating HIV-induced neuroinflammation that can lead to deregulation of
the dopaminergic system.[4]
Since the identification of increased alpha-synuclein deposition
in the substantia nigra of aging PLH,[5]
the hypothesis that expression and progression of neurodegenerative diseases,
for example, Parkinson disease (PD), might be facilitated by HIV was advanced.[4]
Pathogenetic mechanisms of PD and HIV-associated neurologic complications
partially overlap and include chronic neuroinflammation, oxidative stress,
lymphocytic infiltration, and impaired mitochondrial function.[3,6]
Hence, some authors considered a predisposition, even a pathogenetic link,
between HIV and long-term cART, with PD development.[4,7]
However, that notion originated from a few isolated cases or small series (Table 1).[7–12]
We undertook this retrospective, single-center case–control
study to determine whether idiopathic PD characteristics are indeed different
in PLH. We distinguished PD, the idiopathic form of the disease, from
Parkinsonism, the broader descriptive term referring to heterogeneous
diagnoses. Moreover, the Parkinsonism seen in patients with AIDS is often
atypical in presentation, with symmetrical signs of bradykinesia and rigidity,
frequent lack of rest tremor, and early presentation of postural instability
and gait difficulty.[13,14]
Because of different samples and Parkinsonism case definitions in HIV
infection, we chose to limit our study to idiopathic PD according to the United
Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Society (UKPDS) Brain Bank criteria[15]
with asymmetry at onset and response to L-dopa.
This
study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Fondation
Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild. Informed consent was waived because of
anonymous data collection.
Study
Population
Data Analysis
Statistical Analyses
Between 2002 and 2013, we
identified 15 PLH-PD patients followed in 3 university hospital infectious
diseases units caring for 9847 PLH in the Paris area. This reference cohort is
composed of 71% men [mean age of 47 (25% >50) years; 92% taking cART for a median
of 10 years; plVL undetectable in >85%; and median CD4 cell count 550/μL].
Inclusion criteria for PLH-PD were (1) PD diagnosed according to the UKPDS
Brain Bank criteria[15] by 2
neurologists, one of whom is a movement-disorder specialist (J.-P.B. or M.Z.);
(2) DaTSCAN showing typical asymmetric hypofixation in the striatum and putamen
at PD onset; (3) normal 1.5 Tesla brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and
spectroscopy at PD onset; (4) absence of cognitive impairment at onset with a
total Montreal cognitive assessment score >26/30; and (5) follow-up
available for >2 years. Exclusion criteria were (1) head injury with loss of
consciousness >5 minutes; (2) cerebral opportunistic infection or lymphoma;
(3) neurologic disease other than PD; (4) psychiatric disorders other than
depression or anxiety; and (5) neuroleptic treatment or amphetamine use. Two
male HIV-negative controls, randomly selected from the James Parkinson Unit
database at Fondation Rothschild, were matched to each case for age and PD duration,
because they are among the strongest contributors to PD progression in the
general population.[16]Inclusion
criteria for controls were (1) PD diagnosed according to the UKPDS Brain Bank
criteria; (2) absence of cognitive impairment at PD onset with a total short
portable mental status questionnaire <2; and (3) absence of HIV infection.
Their exclusion criteria were the same as for PLH-PD. Case and control
diagnoses were monitored during follow-up to ensure high diagnostic accuracy
and exclude those with atypical Parkinsonism.
Clinical PD characteristics were
first symptoms at onset, the modified Hoehn and Yahr (H-Y) stage,[17]Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale
(UPDRS) motor score,[17] fluctuations,
falls, freezing, dyskinesia, and Montreal cognitive assessment–assessed mental
status for PLH-PD,[18] and
the short portable mental status questionnaire for controls.[19] To evaluate activities of daily
living and handicap severity, we routinely use the Handipark scale,
specifically developed for PD and validated, correlated with the Schwab and
England, UPDRS, and H-Y scales with an independent score from the moment the
patient is examined.[20] Clinical
PD severity was assessed in an operationally defined "on state" based
on expert judgment at the time of the consultation, which is regularly used in
many studies.[21–24] Thus,
patients and controls were not necessarily at the peak of optimal response
(true "on state"). Because the same definition was used for both
groups, our results are valid and comparable. Also, DA replacement therapy
(DRT) information was collected as follows: daily levodopa-equivalent dose
(LED) based on standard methods for calculation,[25] repeated-dose
regimen, and duration of levodopa use. Impulse control disorders (ICDs) were systematically
sought during each consultation.
Data are expressed as medians (range), unless
stated otherwise. The differences between the distributions of categorical data
were compared using Fisher exact test, with P < 0.05
defining significance, whereas continuous variables were compared with the
Wilcoxon rank-sum test. JMP.10 software (2012 SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was
used.
Results
The clinical and laboratory findings for PLH-PD patients are
presented in Table 2.
All were taking cART, and 11 of 15 had CD4 cell counts >500/μL at PD onset.
All had sustained virus suppression and immune reconstitution during follow-up
exceeding 5 years. The median time since HIV diagnosis was 22.7 (3.4–29.4)
years. PLH-PD patient 8 and 4 controls had family histories of PD.
The PD characteristics of cases and controls are detailed in Table 3.
At PD onset, their neurological examinations, median UPDRS motor scores, and
therapeutic management with the same diagnosis-to-starting first-line therapy
(a DA agonist for most) or levodopa interval were comparable. At the end of the
follow-up, the median daily LED and repeated-dose regimen per day, cognition,
and rates of fluctuations, drug-induced dyskinesias, freezing or falls were
also similar.
In contrast some PLH-PD patients' features differed from
controls. At the last consultation, with the same daily LED and regimen for
both groups, PLH had significantly lower median UPDRS motor score, the lower
median modified H-Y stage, and lower median Handipark scale score (Table 3).
More PLH reported hallucinations consisting essentially of feeling of presence
(70%). ICDs were also more frequent in PLH, involving excessive buying and
generosity (n = 8), internet addiction (n = 3), pathologic internet gambling
poker (n = 1), or hypersexuality (n = 2).
Four PLH-PD patients exhibited a very unusual feature consisting
of a stereotyped subacute severe motor degradation over a few weeks that was
totally reversed by levodopa dose intensification. The patients' responses to
usual medications became less consistent, with longer OFF periods. PLH
complained of unrestricted ambulation declining to <500 m, freezing, wearing
off, falls, and camptocormia with abdominal pain. These patients experienced
frank worsening of their bradykinesia and axial rigidity that principally
resulted in abnormal posture, with an UPDRS motor score increment within a few
weeks of ≥20 points, reaching a maximum total score of 60/108 points for
patient 6, whereas his score before worsening had been 12/108 points. In
parallel, the H-Y stage progressed from 1 or 1.5 to 3 or 4, without any
associated confusional state. No precipitating factors, that is, reduction or
discontinuation of dopaminergic medication, introduction of drugs known to
worsen Parkinsonism (neuroleptics, antidepressants, and antiemetics),
infections, gastrointestinal tract diseases, or bone fractures were found,
despite extensive workups. All patients rapidly recovered from their
previous-worsening neurological status after increasing the daily levodopa
dose, ranging from 100 to 300 mg/d. DA agonists were ineffective. Within a mean
of 4 months, the UPDRS motor scores and H-Y stage were totally restored, and
patients regained their previous level of function that lasted for >2 years,
without any other therapeutic adjustment.
After 12 years of good symptomatic control, PLH-PD patient 15
underwent deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (DBS-STN) because
of severe fluctuations with peak-dose dyskinesias and >6 hours-a-day OFF
periods, despite a total daily LED of 1500 mg. Before DBS-STN, his ON state
UPDRS motor score was 12/108 and worsened to 54/108 in the OFF state. No
short-term or long-term adverse event was recorded after the same DBS-STN
procedure as that for the general population: his UPDRS motor score fell to
6/108 and, at his last consultation, 2.5 years later, daily LED was 575 mg/d,
UPDRS motor was 12/108 with no fluctuations.
Discussion
Evidence
from clinical, imaging, biochemical, murine models, and pathological studies
underscored a major contribution of bilateral basal ganglia dysfunction in
HIV-associated neurologic complications, particularly the pathogenesis of HIV
dementia, a subcortical dementia with the core symptoms resembling PD.[3]
Positron emission tomography studies demonstrated a bilateral decreased of
dopaminergic transporters within the caudate and putamen in HIV-infected
patients with dementia compared with seronegative controls.[26]
However, the dopaminergic transporter–reduction patterns in PLH were not
typical of those seen in PD but showed parallel findings of greater reduction
in the putamen than the caudate.[26]
Before
the widespread use of cART, Parkinsonism was relatively frequent in AIDS, being
predominantly iatrogenic, or associated with opportunistic infections or HIV
infection itself. During the pre-cART era (1986–1999), Parkinsonism affected up
to 5%–10% of all PLH.[3,14]
In the post-cART era with better control of HIV infection, that frequency fell
to 0.2%, whereas the mean age of these patients rose from 37.2 to 62.5 years.[8]
Differences between health care systems are important concerns when evaluating
the true prevalence of cART era CNS complications. Indeed, 49% of all PLH in
the United States do not remain under care and only 19% are estimated to
achieve circulating HIV suppression.[27]
In contrast, in France, and other countries where cART is provided free, 87% of
PLH are currently under care with only 9.7% of patients experiencing
virological failure.[28]
In the cART era, parkinsonian symptoms were noted in up to 80% of PLH over 50
years of age from the Hawaii Aging with HIV Cohort, leading to the conclusion
of increased extrapyramidal motor signs with aging.[29]
Among PLH older than 50 years and those younger than 40 years, respectively,
47% and 55% had detectable plVL and 20.7% and 11.1% had HIV-associated
dementia. Because their HIV-control indices were not optimum, those patients
seemed to more closely resemble those before the cART era. That study also
found an excessively high percentage of healthy controls having parkinsonian
symptoms also, that is, 52.9% of matched HIV-negative subjects had ≥1
extrapyramidal sign and 15.7% exhibited ≥3 signs on the UPDRS motor test.
Moreover, no brain imaging was available to exclude a causal lesion. Cohorts
that include untreated or not virologically suppressed subjects overestimate
the true prevalence of neurological complications in the cART era and are a
great cause of alarm for patients and physicians, as recently highlighted for
HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders.[30]
Hence, in studies with asymptomatic and aviraemic HIV-seropositive individuals
on cART, the prevalence of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders is similar
to the prevalence expected in HIV-negative populations.[30]
Tisch
and Brew[7]
described 3 PLH-PD patients, aged 44–53 years, from an Australian cohort of
2500 PLH. Their patients had atypical features distinguishing them from
idiopathic PD: 2 of 3 had a poor or null response to levodopa, despite having
reached therapeutic doses (400 mg/d for 1 and 600 mg/d for the other), and 2 of
3 had early bilateral signs after symptoms onset, whereas they usually appear
after a mean of 4 years in idiopathic PD.[31]
The
diagnosis of idiopathic PD is still mainly clinical. All our patients complied
with the UKPDS Brain Bank criteria,[15]
which are the benchmark of iPD diagnosis and routinely used by all studies as
the gold standard to make the diagnosis process as objective and accurate as
possible.[32]
Moreover, these rigorous diagnostic criteria applied during a specialist's
assessment, as in our study, achieved 95% diagnostic accuracy.[32]
As recommended, we regularly reapplied these criteria to all our patients, HIV+
or not, and, notably, at the end of the median 6.5-year follow-up to minimize
clinical misdiagnosis and exclude atypical features. Hence, retrospective
application of the UKPDS Brain Bank criteria improved the diagnostic accuracy
to 90%.[32,33]
Brain magnetic resonance imaging of PLH excluded AIDS-associated Parkinsonism
with opportunistic infection, tumor, or CNS Whipple disease.[14]
DaTSCAN is not mandatory for the diagnosis of idiopathic PD. We added it to the
UKPDS Brain Bank criteria to confirm the presence of a frank asymmetric
hypofixation in the striatum and putamen in all PD-PLH and to assure that a
degenerative process was indeed responsible for the parkinsonian symptoms.[33]
DaTSCAN sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of early iPD patients
were 79% and 97%, respectively.[34]
Finally, the excellent and sustained clinical benefit of DRT during a mean
follow-up of >6 years provided the best confirmation of the diagnosis of
idiopathic PD for our patients. Indeed, for subjects responsive to DRT,
diagnostic accuracy of PD for disease lasting >5 years reached 88%.[35]
Studied subjects were part of a PLH cohort taking effective cART with most
having sustained virus suppression and >500 CD4 lymphocytes per microliter.
In resource-rich health care settings, these are the most relevant subjects to
study the consequences of prolonged HIV infection and cART on cerebral
function.
Forty
percent of our HIV-infected PD patients were 50 years or younger at onset, as
described in case reports.[7,10–12]
If the bulk of the population with the classic iPD form is 40–75 years of age,[36]
exhibiting a bimodal distribution of iPD-onset age with peaks at 40–44 years
and 75–79 years,[37]
this relatively young age of onset might also be linked to the specificity of
the free health care system in France. All PLH have quarterly consultations and
a systematic thorough annual check-up with their infectious diseases
specialists. Moreover, our cohort patients have easy access to neurological
consultations. The results of several studies demonstrated that a range of
prediagnostic features are present several years before iPD diagnosis, with a
mean time between first symptoms noted by patients and diagnosis reaching 10.2
years.[38]
These favorable conditions might have referred patients as soon as their
initial symptoms were present.
During
a 12-year period, we diagnosed only 15 PD among a cohort of 9847 PLH, which is
much less than expected based on the study by Tisch and Brew[7]
who predicted a 4–8 times higher PD incidence in PLH. Indeed, according to
their calculation, we should have diagnosed at least 44–176 PLH with PD during
our study period. In our cohort, the PD incidence and prevalence rates were
12.7 person years and 152 per 100,000, respectively. In Western general
populations, the annual PD incidence rates range from 9 to 22 per 100,000
inhabitants[39]
and prevalence of 100–200 per 100,000 persons.[40]
Our results do not support a higher PD frequency in PLH with good HIV-control
indices.
Overall,
PD clinical characteristics and therapy did not differ between PLH and
controls. With the same treatment guidelines proposed for idiopathic PD, PLH
had rapid and good responses to DRT that was well tolerated in combination with
cART. We did not observe drug intolerance or cART interactions, as rarely
described,[11]
notably with protease inhibitors.[9]
The results of animal studies suggested that levodopa could increase the risk
of HIV replication and affect immune cells resulting in accelerated disease
progression.[41]
HIV-control indices remained stable during follow-up. The long-term therapeutic
responses were also particularly good, and PLH benefited from the same
so-called "honeymoon" period described for idiopathic PD. Our
patients 1 and 8 had unilateral tremors as their presenting symptom, responded
very well to DRT, and were staged H-Y 1 after 10 years of follow-up. The results
of several studies on the general population demonstrated that tremor-dominant
iPD has a slower disease progression rate, with 70% of patients remaining at
H-Y stage 1 or 2 for years.[42]
As early as 1967, when no DRT was available, Hoehn and Yahr[43]
reported in their seminal article that about one third of their iPD patients,
regardless of phenotypes, had remained in stage 1 or 2 for until 10 years. Our
patient 15 and 2 other published cases[10,11]
suggest that DBS-STN, when pertinent, should be proposed with the same
inclusion and exclusion criteria as for the general population.
The
past decade has seen growing recognition of iPD phenotypic heterogeneity in the
patterns of initial symptoms and progression rates. All these differences do
not invalidate the iPD diagnoses, as demonstrated by autopsy studies.[44]
As reported for the general population, our case–control study based on the
same diagnosis criteria for both groups demonstrated some phenotypic
differences between HIV+ and HIV-negative patients. Notably, some
characteristics were specific to PD in PLH, raising the possibility of
HIV-induced DA-transmission changes by comparison with idiopathic PD. With the
same total mean daily LED and dose regimen at the last consultation, PLH-PD
patients performed significantly better than controls, with lower Handipark
scale and UPDRS motor scores, and an H-Y stage. In keeping with the natural
history of treated idiopathic PD, controls had a mean H-Y stage of 2 after 4.3
years on levodopa and 42% of them had reached H-Y stage 2.5 at the last visit.[31]
With the same PD duration, 80% of PLH had an H-Y stage <2. In our experience
(unpublished data), the mean Handipark scale score after 4 years on levodopa
was 4.4, whereas this score was <2 for 60% of our PLH-PD patients. Nonmotor
complications (eg, ICD and feeling of presence) were also more frequent in PLH
than controls, whereas DRT doses and regimens were similar. Notably, DA
agonists were not overprescribed in PD-PLH compared with controls (100% vs 94%,
respectively). In particular, none of these PD-PLH reported recreational or
polydrug use.
Dysfunction
of dopaminergic neurotransmission, with hypersensitivity of the nigrostriatal
pathways in the CNS of PLH, has been demonstrated.[41]
The results of numerous studies support the hypothesis that HIV induces
neuroinflammation in the structure and function of the CNS reward pathways.[45]
A number of transgenic rodent models have been validated for investigating
neurologically related issues, notably HIV-related pathology and immune
dysfunction.[45]
A gp120-transgenic mouse model showed increased sensitivity to the rewarding
effects of methamphetamine.[45]
PLH are also more likely to abuse substances than the general population,
notably men having sex with men.[46]
It could be the consequence of a premorbid risk-taking personality but HIV
could also be involved in sensitizing individuals to the pleasurable effects of
these substances.[45]
A functional adaptation in presynaptic and postsynaptic dopaminergic neurons
leading to up-regulation of DA receptors could be a plausible explanation of
the PD discrepancies associated with HIV infection and cART.[47]
Those authors described abnormal dopaminergic markers with sharply increased
DA-transporter concentrations, decreased DA synthesis, fewer DA D2
autoreceptors at the presynaptic level, and more DA D3 receptors at the
postsynaptic level, whereas DA D1 receptors remained unchanged.[47]
Postmortem studies from individuals with HIV encephalitis suggested increased
dopaminergic tone in the striatum.[47]
These shifts are opposite to what is observed in idiopathic PD, in which
striatum dopaminergic tone and receptor occupancy are low.[6]
This HIV-induced functional adaptation of dopaminergic neurons might
counterbalance the degenerative neuronal loss and explain the discrepancies
observed in PLH-PD patients.
For
treated PD patients, the average annual progression of motor symptoms is modest
but continuous[48]
with worsening resulting from irreversible progression of neuronal loss. Other
than intervening events, particularly infectious and gastrointestinal
illnesses, discontinuation of dopaminergic medications, and administration of
antidopaminergic drugs, severe acute worsening of UPDRS motor scores is highly
improbable in idiopathic PD.[31,33]
We observed such rapid deterioration in 4 of 15 PLH-PD patients in the absence
of precipitating events, leading to considerable rises of their UPDRS motor
scores, accompanied by unresponsiveness to the same drug regimen that had
adequately corrected symptoms so far. These patients did not differ from the
others, with comparable parkinsonian phenotype or longer PD duration. Moreover,
they had the same age at PD onset, responses to DRT, mean daily LED, the UPDRS
motor scores, and H-Y stage, when deterioration occurred and at the last
consultation. They did not develop PD-related or HIV-associated cognitive
impairment. Their HIV infection was immunovirologically controlled without any
viral escape. Hence, their cART has not been modified. Posture was most affected
because of the appearance or worsening of axial hypertonicity. It is generally
accepted that axial tone and posture abnormalities are more common in advanced
PD, are not levodopa-responsive phenomena,[49]
and even worsen under levodopa.[50]
The UPDRS motor score and H-Y stage returned to their previous levels, a mean
of 4 months after the intensification of the total levodopa dose. This
impressive, acute functional deterioration was like a "bolt from the
blue," and was rapidly and long-lastingly levodopa-responsive. To our
knowledge, it is unique to HIV-associated PD and very unusual in idiopathic PD.
The
principal strength of this study is its recruitment of participants from a
large cohort of immunovirologically controlled PLH and the long-term follow-up
of PD since onset, enabling description of the natural history of treated PD in
PLH. Previous reports were hampered by small patient numbers or isolated case
reports, short follow-up, and absence of matched controls. Our study's
limitations include unavailable neurologic examination results for the entire
PLH cohort, but they were available for those referred by their infectious
diseases specialists. However, in France, all PLH have a systematic annual
check-up with thorough physical examination, and access and referral to weekly
neurologic consultation in each of the 3 Infectious Diseases Units
participating in this study is assured by 2 neurologists (A.M. and A.G.). The
risk that a PLH-PD patient could have been missed is highly improbable over the
12-year study period.[35]
Some sex discrepancies were reported, with a higher PD burden in men;[51]
because all our PLH-PD patients are men, we cannot extrapolate our results to
HIV-infected women. Our control and PLH-PD patients may not necessarily be
representative of an underlying population of newly diagnosed PD patients,
because they were derived from clinics specializing in PD and neurologic
disorders linked to HIV infection. The better response to DRT of HIV-infected PD
patients could be biased by the retrospective character of this study. These
limitations are tempered by the fact that the same selection criteria were
applied for both cases and controls.
A
higher incidence of medical comorbidities will probably emerge with the aging
of PLH. Although more new PD cases are likely to be diagnosed in PLH, we
consider this association to be merely a simultaneous occurrence with no
etiopathogenetic link, like the majority of authors who reported PD in
association with HIV.[10]
The same therapeutic regimen should be proposed to PLH-PD patients but some
peculiarities associated with HIV infection suggest better and sustained
responses to DRT. Our results need to be confirmed with prospective and
multicenter studies.
No comments:
Post a Comment